Smugmug vs. Flickr
A review of the online photo sharing sites Smugmug and Flickr and why I prefer both of them for different things. I am no longer updating my Zoto review…I just don’t have the time to keep it relatively up-to-date.
Ever since I got a digital camera I’ve wanted to have an online photo gallery. Attempts at creating my own photo gallery were awkward and slow at best. Then I discovered Smugmug and Flickr. I actually read about Flickr first (it has gotten a lot of publicity) and signed up for it. I also purchased an account for my parents as a Christmas present. A few weeks later I decided to try the free trial of Smugmug. The main difference between Flickr and Smugmug is that Flickr wants to facilitate an online photo sharing community more so than Smugmug. Smugmug has that capability as well but is more apt at organizing photos into galleries for long-term photo storage/organization. While both sites offer tags (ability to assign words to certain pictures to assist in searching), Flickr does not have as good of an organization system as Smugmug does. Photos on Flickr are grouped into “Sets”; but there is no further hierarchy than that. For example, I could not create a gallery called “Travel” and have multiple sets within that gallery on Flickr. Smugmug makes it very easy to set up this hierarchical organization system, as shown with my “Travel” site here.
Smugmug seems to be a more professional photo-sharing site than Flickr and seems more refined. And, as a Power user, you can customize your site however you like as well as upload MPEG1 video. Both allow you to order backups of your photos on DVD or CD for a nominal fee. Flickr, on the other hand, looks to appeal to the “blogging generation” of Internet users. With Flickr you have the ability to order photo books, DVD slideshows, or postage stamps of your photos. Read more about this. One of its best features is the “Save to Favorites” ability. Whenever you see a great picture you can click that button and it will save it in a central place for you. There are so many amazing pictures on Flickr that this comes in much use. You can also browse other people’s favorites. Smugmug does not currently have this feature. However, Smugmug does have a feature called PhotoRank that allows you and everyone else to vote…either thumbs up or down on a photo. To see this feature in action, browse the favorite photos. In place of the community created through browsing and commenting on Flickr, Smugmug offers an excellent digital photo forum called Digital Grin where you can share and get feedback on pictures. There are also photo contests with prizes. The cool thing about this versus Flickr is that the people on Digital Grin are professional photographers and can give you excellent advice. Plus, there’s entire forums devoted to Photoshop and advanced photography techniques. Smugmug also has communities where users with similar interests can get together and share their photos.
Customer service for both Flickr and Smugmug is great compared to the typical online site. Flickr’s responses have generally been fast and helpful. They offer a few ways to contact them: Flickr Mail, standard email, or leaving a message in one of the forums. Smugmug has two ways of offering support. You can post and ask questions on the Digital Grin forum or via standard email. I just emailed Smugmug a question and they responded satisfactorily literally within minutes. Smugmug has always replied quickly, even when I emailed them at 10PM (Central Time) on a Saturday night. Flickr’s responses generally take a few days, which is not that bad at all. The speed difference could be because Smugmug has significantly fewer users that Flickr.
Here is also a message board posting that testifies to Smugmug’s dedication to the customer: The 2+ terabyte Question. On the second page, the Smugmug CEO replies:
“Wow, that must be close to 500,000 JPEGs! Quite a collection - I can’t wait to see them.
![]()
So we’ve always said “unlimited storage” and we mean what we say. We’re happy to take your photos and host them, but we need a little time to prepare.
Just so you know, this is something like a $20,000 first-year commitment for us in terms of disk space, power, cooling, and physical space. You’ll basically have two complete RAID arrays to yourself in our datacenter. Of course, you’ll only pay your [$40, $60, or $150] per year, depending on your account level. Again, we’re happy to do it - but I want to be up front here and let you know that we need to order some equipment and get it installed to accept your photos. We’re not geared for accepting 2.5TB overnight.
![]()
We’ll also be buying extra image processing machines just for your batch of photos. Luckily, once yours are done, everyone else at smugmug will get to benefit from them, so I don’t consider that a cost to host you.
Does that sound fair? Can we ask you to hold off while we order and install the equipment and power required?”
A unique feature of Smugmug is its ability to sort photos by keyword. Yes, Flickr offers tagging, but Smugmug’s rendition is much more powerful. Consider: I’m attaching the keywords of any family members and the location to all my photos. So, if I want to find all the photos that include a picture of me, then I just click “Scott.” Or, should I want to find a picture of my brother, “Ross,” I would click his name. The powerful features are called “Related words” and “Combine with.” For example, suppose I want to find a photo that has a picture of Ross and I from our family trip to California. I would just click on the keyword “Scott,” then choose to combine with “Ross,” and finally to combine with “california.” It’s as easy as that! Removing keywords from the search is just as simple.
Smugmug also offers integration with the Google Maps API. In layman’s terms this means that you can tag a photo with a specific location. For example, I could search for all photos from Ireland. Or, I could restrict my search to specific keywords for photos within Ireland. Here’s one of the examples given on Smugmug’s website: Dgrin’s World Tour. Flickr has this ability but is using Yahoo Maps instead. Flickr Geotagging
Things not yet mentioned regarding Smugmug:
1) Themes: All users have access to a huge variety of themes. You can even have different themes for different galleries. And, when creating a new gallery, themes can be quickly previewed before using. Standard users ($39.95/year) have access to all the themes, but only Power ($59.95) and Professional ($149.95) give you the option to customize your site with your own code. All users have access to the recently updated AJAX interface. This new interface is much faster than the old one…the entire page isn’t reloaded when you click on a photo, just the photo. Flickr does not offer the ability to customize your site directly (Power and Pro level users) or with Themes (all users).
2) Bandwidth/Space: All users get unlimited space and bandwidth. Photos in Standard and Power accounts can be up to 8MB big, while Professionals get up to 16MB. For all users, 48 megapixels is the limit.
3) Backups: Smugmug now stores at least 4 copies of every new photo in 3 different datacenters in 3 states, using both internal SmugMug storage and the storage infrastructure of a partner who’s in the business of data availability.
4) Private Photos: Private password-protected galleries can be created. You can choose if you want the private galleries to appear on the main page (with a password hint or not) or to be completely hidden from the public. ShareGroups offer the ability to create a unique URL that you can give to people to access the photos directly.
5) Professional Specific Features: Sell prints and digital photos. Protect photos with watermark and right-click protection. Use a custom domain name. Completely remove all references to Smugmug, effectively hosting the photos transparently.
6. Dynamically resizing photos: This means that if you have a larger monitor, photos will automatically be resized to use the extra space. This feature can also be seen just by resizing your browser window. Try it out here with your browser window at maximum size. Wait until it loads, notice the size of the photo, and then make the window smaller. The photo will automatically be resized to fit better in the smaller window.
7. Customize resized photos: Smugmug offers the typical tiny, thumbnail, small, medium, large, and original (if you choose to allow originals to be downloaded). However, you can also choose custom resolutions. For example, this panorama of 17 photos of Dead Horse Point State Park is originally 14708×2698 pixels. Even the large size can’t do it justice. It would be nice to have a size somewhere between the original and large. Now you can —> just append the resolution you want to the end of the file. For example, the last photo becomes http://scottklettke.smugmug.com/photos/132873354-5451×1000.jpg.
Recent Changes:
Release Notes. Smugmug constantly adds improvements and new features. These include most recently: custom watermarks, priced digital downloads, dynamic backprinting, and proof delayed shipping.
Things not yet mentioned regarding Flickr:
1) Free Account: Smugmug offers a complete, fully functional 14-day trial account. Flickr has a limited-function free account. This is great if you have a smaller number of photos and/or just want to comment and keep track of your favorite photos. There is currently no way on Smugmug to keep track of your favorite photos, though you can comment without creating an account.
2) Bandwidth/Space: Free users have a 100 MB monthly upload limit of photos up to 5 MB in size. Pro Accounts ($24.95) get unlimited bandwidth, upload, and storage with a limit of 10 MB per photo. Maximum resolution is not stated directly but is approximately 30 megapixels.
3) Private Photos: Photosets (equivalent to a gallery in Smugmug, though without hierarchical organization) can be set so that viewing is restricted to family and/or friends or viewable at a unique URL with a Guest Pass.
4) Groups: Similar to Smugmug’s Communities, Flickr offers a ton of Groups that you can join. If you want your photos to get views and comments, joining and contributing to an appropriate group is the best way to do it.
More information: Smugmug, Flickr
In summary, Smugmug is great if you desire to have very well organized photo galleries with the ability to order high quality prints. Feel free to take the tour of Smugmug. If you prefer a sense of online community over organization of your photos than Flickr may be best for you. I ended up getting my folks a subscription to Smugmug instead of Flickr. For their purposes, Smugmug’s site was less confusing and easier to use, and the ability to organize photos and order prints made Smugmug the best for them. Flickr now also offers printing through its partnership with Target Stores. 4×6 prints are 19 cents each (same price as Smugmug) and can be delivered or picked up from any Target Store. I can personally vouch for the quality of the Smugmug prints but have not yet tried Flickr’s printing, though I would also expect it to be high quality.
Flickr’s annual fee has been reduced to $24.95 with Yahoo’s acquisition, while Smugmug’s annual fee is $39.95. Try both and see which one you like. Flickr offers a free but restricted version, while Smugmug offers the real thing free for a 14-day trial (during the trial you can switch between Standard, Power, or Professional accounts). If you decide to try Smugmug, enter H8yH17Omj9w86 in the email/coupon section near the bottom of the sign up page. (Or follow this link Smugmug. You’ll help a college student save $10 off his next subscription and you’ll save $5 off of your subscription.) Smugmug no longer requires a credit card to set up…if you choose not to stay with Smugmug after your free trial, your account will automatically be canceled.
Smugmug also just recently started a JotSpot Wiki that is a repository for customizations, hacks, tips, and tricks. A review of the beta AJAX interface is available here.
Update (1/22/2007): AJAX interface is now live on all Smugmug accounts. Read about it here: Speed, Beauty, & Brains
If you have any questions please ask below. I usually respond within a day. If you want a personal response please direct your query to the Contact at the top of the page. Thanks! Please comment and let me know what you ultimately chose.
(This review was originally written for my Smugmug Review on Amazon).
Other Smugmug and Flickr sites:
Flickr vs. Smugmug on Michael McDaniel’s Blog
http://www.tygar.net/photos.htm - Good comparison
Wired Review - Photo Sites Share and Share Alike” (from Januaray 2005)
Photo Site a Hit With Bloggers - An older Wired article talking about the advantages of online photo sharing, Flickr specifically
Smugmug.com Review and Overview
Smugmug: a hot photo-sharing site
Smugmug’s own page claiming to be the best
Digital Dad - Taking a Look at Smugmug
Flickr (beta) Review by PC Magazine
USA Today: 2/8/2007 Pictures worth more than a thousand words on upgraded photo sites
The Zoto review below is out-dated and will no longer be updated…
There is also a new photo sharing site called Zoto. They are currently in beta and offer a free account and a paid account. Unlike Flickr or Smugmug, Zoto does not offer any organization into galleries or sets. However, it does allow organization by smart tags, including Who, What, When, and Where. The website is very fast, though, and I like the layout. It is very simple and only does exactly what you expect, show pictures. Since they are in beta, I would imagine that organization into galleries (or folders) is high on their list of improvements. For those Internet users who want a free place to store and share photos but don’t want to pay for Flickr or Smugmug and need more than Flickr’s free account offers, Zoto is a great. One of the unique features of Zoto is the ability to create custom sized images on the fly. However, compared to Flickr or Smugmug, Zoto’s pay service seems expensive for what you get, though again this may change as the beta improves. So far I have not had a chance to try the Windows photo uploader but have not been too impressed with the Linux uploader as I have not been able to get it to successfully compile. I really wish they would offer an in-the-webpage Java solution that Smugmug offers. Currently, you have to select photos individually to upload, which is unacceptable when trying to upload hundreds of photos. In the free account they offer:
- 2G of space for up to 2,000 photos
- Unrestricted uploading
- Permanent storage of originals
- Organize using Smart Tags
Unlimited photo storage and sharing - FREE Trial of Smugmug.
———————————
Updated: February 21, 2007







July 3rd, 2005 22:24
as an FYI zoto’s site doesn’t render (properly) in firefox.
July 19th, 2005 16:12
Jon, what render problems are you having? It is working fine for me…
August 8th, 2005 07:41
I’m signing up through your link. I’m actually giving it a try, for the 7 days. I’m a college student as well, and I finally saved up to get a digital camera, and I’m in love ith it.
Your site definitely helped me out in choosing the right site (I was leaning away from flickr because of it’s organization, and VERY turned off by not being able to customize my site)
I’ll check the 7-day trial, and I’m probably going to go with the power user account, to fully customize it.
Anyways, Thanks for your help!
August 10th, 2005 01:57
Hey Albert,
Glad that I could help! Send me an email if you have any further questions.
August 18th, 2005 18:24
i have started playing around with smugmaps. love this stuff, great for my travelling pics.
August 19th, 2005 22:49
Yeah, I’ve just started playing around with Smugmaps too. It’s a great feature! I can’t wait until they implement bulk geography editing; it takes time right now to add the location for each photo. I’m really impressed with their use of Ajax too and expect to see some more amazing things in the future.
July 21st, 2006 04:01
I’ve been using Zoto for well over a year now and am generally quite happy with it. My main interest is in organising photos so that they can bew found easily. The Uploader is also very nice in most respect - though it doesn’t let you create new tags on the fly. My other favourite features are that it has a blog-posting function, a javascript slideshow feature, and can upload single photos by email.
The one thing I wish it had is a method of creating subdomains that can be secured according to variable criteria. I would like secure sections within my site, one for friends and family, one for work, another for subscriber-only images, and so forth. My guess is that nobody provides this kind of structure, along with teh more powerful ease of navigation and the fine graphical layout of Zoto.
December 30th, 2006 00:15
Your article is why I love the internet. I have available to me intelligent & informative articles, like yours, that make life’s decisions easier.
Within the last few days I have decided on my 2nd career (Professional Outdoor/Nature photography). Your article was well written & allowed me to decide on smugmug as my primary medium of getting my name out there.
Wish all my questions, as I start my new venture, could be answered by reading only 1 site. Thanks for taking the time to critique the sites.
Vincent
January 15th, 2007 16:59
Hi Vincent,
I’m glad that you found my review article informative. I originally wrote the article way back in May 2005, but I’m trying to keep it updated as much as I can. Both Flickr and Smugmug implement changes so rapidly that it is difficult to do so.
Good luck with your new career!
February 26th, 2007 23:47
Excellent article, Scott. This has been a great read for me as I decide between SmugMug and Flickr. I’m a big fan of Flickr, but the organizational and theming options of SmugMug are very tempting. Decisions decisions!
Cheers,
Brian
April 18th, 2007 03:50
I have done a LOT of searching, researching and RE-searching about the ins/outs of the major online photo sharing players out there. My list had pretty much shrunk to 2. Flickr vs. SmugMug…
Your review of the two is fair and non-biased (it seems many reviewers have a preference before writing their review which comes through in their writing…).
Thank you for taking the time to offer such a well-written and thorough review!
Also, many of the write-ups I’ve seen are nearly a year old, so I must applaud you for your commitment thus far to keeping up with the changes.
Your inclusion of relevant links is skillfully done and helpful to a reader seeking more knowledge.
I will be giving SmugMug a trial and I hereby PROMISE to use your referral link. Keep up the good work! I hope you & your article get the recognition you deserve…somebody link to and/or pay this man!
Thanks again
April 20th, 2007 12:48
Just to say thanks, for bothering. I was considering that a flickr pro account would save me a bit of money, but for my needs, which are to organise and backup my photos primarily, you’ve convinced me to stay with smugmug.
May 7th, 2007 13:49
I’m storing a account in Smugmug for years, and I love the service. Recently I compared Flickr with Smugmug because I’m living in Argentina, and the currency conversion is $(US)1=$(AR)3, so the difference in price ($15) between Flickr and the Smugmug’s standard account is 3 times bigger for my cost of life here
I played a time with Flickr but I think smugmug is better, has a lot of useful features and the home page of your pics sorting by albums is better that your home in flickr. I decided stay with smugmug, the difference worth the money, and I forget evaluate the better tags use of smugmug when I made the decision. And is true, the costumer support is very quickly and efficient.
August 16th, 2007 10:23
The tagging in http://atpic.com is even better than those used at flickr and smugmug: it is both a bookmarking and a folksonomy tool. The popularity of a page is also function of how many people bookmarked (tagged) you documents.
August 17th, 2007 08:24
Thanks for the article
November 22nd, 2007 03:32
hi. thanks for the article — i liked it. well i just signed up for smugmug and used your coupon code. oh yeah, happy thx giving too. i should prob go to sleep now and start uploading my photos later.