More Gmail Invites

Guess what? Google gave out some more Gmail invites! I now have 7 invites remaining. The FIRST SEVEN people that leave a comment here will get it. Please read that again. I only have 7 invites so once I’m out, I’m out. I’m not going to try and scavenge up some invites from friends like I did before.

Don’t worry. The first 7 people that respond will get an invite. However, I have a final coming up so I might not be able to send it right away.

3 remaining!!!

I also have some direct links to Gmail Invites…first come first served.

http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-e3693272fd-e9172c830a-5781a5b467
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-e3693272fd-e490106444-c1f8aa151d
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-e3693272fd-5dbc20b068-52542877bf
http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-e3693272fd-83c9197f30-a88315d372

Please only take one!

Bin Laden said to aim message at Saudis

Bin Laden said to aim message at Saudis

By DONNA ABU-NASR
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Osama bin Laden’s latest message, his first directed specifically at Saudis in years, has been widely seen as an attempt to show he is still a player in his homeland despite a security clampdown that has sharply limited al-Qaida’s field for terrorist operations in the conservative kingdom.

…

Robert Jordan, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said bin Laden’s message was a reflection of how weakened he and al-Qaida had become. “He’s now resorting to political rhetoric to try to influence the people,” Jordan said.

One way bin Laden is trying to do that is by ridiculing upcoming, three-stage municipal elections in the kingdom, which begin in February and are seen as an attempt by the government to open the country to political reform.

“This hasn’t changed anything. …The best they can do is that they will go into the elections game as happened before in Yemen and Jordan or Egypt and move in a vicious circle for dozens of years. This is regardless of the fact that it is prohibited to enter the infidel legislative councils,” bin Laden said.

Jordan said bin Laden’s reference to the elections “shows he’s very nervous” about them.

“He’s trying create the same kind of divisiveness we’re seeing in Iraq about the elections, but I don’t think he’s going to succeed because Saudi Arabia is a much more homogenous society,” he said.

Jordan also said it would be hard for the militants to carry out a huge attack on oil installations in the kingdom that would significantly disrupt production or distribution. At most, isolated attacks could be launched on less-guarded areas, he said, adding that targeting the kingdom’s oil industry could backfire.

“This (oil) is the entire economic base of the country, and even those who might be critical of the West or America will be greatly offended by any destruction of their really only means of economic progress and survival,” he said.

TIME Person of the Year 2004: George W. Bush

TIME Person of the Year 2004: George W. Bush

George W. Bush

“For sticking to his guns (literally and figuratively), for reshaping the rules of politics to fit his ten-gallon-hat leadership style and for persuading a majority of voters that he deserved to be in the White House for another four years, George W. Bush is TIME’s 2004 Person of the Year.”

Eagles rather than doves nestle in the Oval Office Christmas tree, pinecones the size of footballs are piled around the fireplace, and the President of the United States is pretty close to lounging in Armchair One. He’s wearing a blue pinstripe suit, and his shoes are shined bright enough to shave in. He is loose, lively, framing a point with his hands or extending his arm with his fingers up as though he’s throwing a big idea gently across the room.

“I’ve had a lot going on, so I haven’t been in a very reflective mood,” says the man who has just replaced half his Cabinet, dispatched 12,000 more troops into battle, arm wrestled lawmakers over an intelligence bill, held his third economic summit and begun to lay the second-term paving stones on which he will walk off into history. Asked about his re-election, he replies, “I think over the Christmas holidays it’ll all sink in.”

As he says this, George W. Bush is about to set a political record. The first TIME poll since the election has his approval rating at 49%. Gallup has it at 53%, which doesn’t sound bad unless you consider that it’s the lowest December rating for a re-elected President in Gallup’s history. That is not a great concern, however, since he has run his last race, and it is not a surprise to a President who tends to measure his progress by the enemies he makes. “Sometimes you’re defined by your critics,” he says. “My presidency is one that has drawn some fire, whether it be at home or around the world. Unfortunately, if you’re doing big things, most of the time you’re never going to be around to see them [to fruition], whether it be cultural change or spreading democracy in parts of the world where people just don’t believe it can happen. I understand that. I don’t expect many short-term historians to write nice things about me.”

Yet even halfway through his presidency, Bush says, he already sees his historic gamble paying off. He watched in satisfaction the inauguration of Afghan President Hamid Karzai. “I’m not suggesting you’re looking at the final chapter in Afghanistan, but the elections were amazing. And if you go back and look at the prognosis about Afghanistan—whether it be the decision [for the U.S. to invade] in the first place, the ‘quagmire,’ whether or not the people can even vote—it’s a remarkable experience.” Bush views his decision to press for the transformation of Afghanistan and then Iraq—as opposed to “managing calm in the hopes that there won’t be another September 11th, that the Salafist [radical Islamist] movement will somehow wither on the vine, that somehow these killers won’t get a weapon of mass destruction”—as the heart of not just his foreign policy but his victory. “The election was about the use of American influence,” he says. “I can remember people trying to shift the debate. I wanted the debate to be on a lot of issues, but I also wanted everybody to clearly understand exactly what my thinking was. The debates and all the noise and all the rhetoric were aimed at making very clear the stakes in this election when it comes to foreign policy.”
Continue reading →

Math Whiz Breaks Calculation Record

My Way News

“A 38-year-old with degrees in psychology, education and computer science needed only 11.8 seconds to calculate the 13th root of a 100-digit number in his head, setting a new record, organizers said.”

“”I first think of an elegant problem-solving algorithm and the result comes immediately,” said Mittring, who beat the previous record of 13.55 seconds, set by the Frenchman Alexis Lemaire in 2002, according to organizers of the Tuesday night event.”

The same guy also holds the world record for memorizing 22 random digits in just four seconds.

Doctors: Yushchenko was poisoned

Yushchenko Poisoned With Dioxin
The picture combo shows Viktor Yushchenko in file photos dated March 28, 2002, left, and Dec. 6, 2004, right. The Ukrainian opposition leader and presidential candidate’s mysterious illness that scared his face was caused by dioxin poisoning, doctors said Saturday Dec. 11, 2004, in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Viktor Pobedinsky/Efrem Lukatsky) Source: ABC News

CNN International Article

VIENNA, Austria — Dioxin poisoning caused the disfiguring illness afflicting Ukraine opposition presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko, doctors at an Austrian hospital have said.

Doctors told a news conference Saturday they suspect a “third party” administered the poison, possibly by putting it in Yushchenko’s soup.

Dr. Michael Zimpfer, director of the private Rudolphinerhaus clinic in Vienna, said Yushchenko was now in satisfactory condition and that dioxin levels in his liver have returned to normal.

Dr. Nikolai Korpan added that no functional damage would remain and that Yushchenko was “fully capable of working,” The Associated Press reported.

Blood and skin tests conducted over the past 24 hours in Austria and other European clinics provided the evidence of poisoning, Zimpfer said.

“There is no doubt about the fact that Mr. Yushchenko’s disease has been caused by a case of poisoning by dioxin,” Zimpfer said.

Continue reading →

Truth about Tax-Cuts

I found this in some OTW forum and thought that it was very interesting:

While we’re watching the political commercials and listening to the
politicians spin their web around unsuspecting and misinformed
people…here’s a “Reality” lesson in economics.

Top 1% earn 21% of all income; pay 37-1/2% of all taxes
Top 5% earn 35% of all income; pay 56-1/2% of all taxes
Top 10% earn 46% of all income; pay 67% of all taxes
Top 25% pay 84% of all taxes
Top 50% pay 96-1/2% of all taxes
Bottom 50% pay 3-1/2% of all taxes

Just in case we are not completely clear on this issue, here is an old
story that we hope will help explain our US Tax System…….

Suppose that every day, ten people go out for dinner.

The bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something
like this:

The first four people (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh $7. The eighth
$12. The ninth $18. The tenth person (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten people ate dinner in the
restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one
day, the owner threw them a curve.

“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the
cost of your daily meal by $20.”

So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay
their bill the way we pay our taxes.

So, the first four people were unaffected. They would still eat for free.
But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up
the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share’?

The six people realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth person and the sixth
person would each end up being ‘PAID’ to eat their meal.

So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each
person’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the
amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth person, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings.)

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to
eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the people began to compare
their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20,” declared the sixth person. He pointed
to the tenth person “but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth person. “I only saved a dollar,
too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I got!”

“That’s true!!” shouted the seventh person. “Why should he get $10 back
when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four people in unison. “We didn’t get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!”

The nine people surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth person didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat
down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they
discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all
of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit
from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and
they just may not show up at the table anymore.

My parents’ volleyball team marks 22 years together

My parents’ volleyball team has played together for over 22 years and compiled a higher than a 71% winning percentage (won over 1,000 games out of 1,400 played). They are all in their 50’s now and are routinely winning against teams of people in their mid-20’s to 30’s. Way to go!! 😉

The Coasters Volleyball Team

Sheboygan-Press article:

By Mary Eckardt
Sheboygan Press staff

They’re legends of the volleyball world, according to their captain, David Quasius.

Actually, a lot of their opponents think they’re pretty good, too.

For 22 years, Quasius’ team of four 50-something couples, The Coasters — now referred to as “The Oldsters” — has been playing volleyball through the YMCA, Community Rec-reation Department, summer and tavern leagues and just about any other slightly-organized competition they could find.

They’ve won more than 1,000 of the 1,400 games they’ve played over the years, mostly against teams with members in their late 20s to early 30s.

Quasius turned 58 Friday; his wife, Kathy is 58; Roger Klettke is 58; his wife, Jane, 53; Bill and Mary Jo Braatz are 57 and 56 respectively; and the youngsters are 51- and 50-year-old Don and Mary Schaning.

Klettke says he hopes to still be competing and contributing at 60. Then it might be time to call it quits.
Continue reading →

Jeopardy! star finally meets his match

IllogicalStudent writes on Slashdot “The Toronto Star is reporting that the episode of Jeopardy where Ken Jennings (a.k.a. ‘The Jeopardy Guy’) finally loses aired this evening. It came down to a 2-person finish (3rd had -2600 at the end of Double Jeopardy, and was eliminated) between Ken and opponent Nancy Zerg, with the final category being Business & Industry. Ken answered ‘Fed Ex’ to the question ‘Most of this firm’s 70,000 seasonal white-collar employees work only four months a year,’ when the correct answer was ‘H&R Block.’ Ken finished his record-streak with just over $2.5 Million.”

Article on the Toronto Star

In other Jeopardy news, a Carnegie Mellon University student bets $1337. For the uninitiated, in ‘leetspeak’ 1337 translates to ‘leet’ or ‘elite.'”

I support US Marines who kill terrorists

To: U.S. Congress

Friday November 12 2004

U.S.Marines were fired upon by snipers and insurgents armed with rocket-propelled grenades from a mosque and an adjacent building. The Marines returned fire with tank shells and machine guns.

They eventually stormed the mosque, killing 10 insurgents and wounding five others, and showing a cache of rifles and grenades for journalists.

The Marines told the pool reporter that the wounded insurgents would be left behind for others to pick up and move to the rear for treatment. But Saturday, another squad of Marines found that the mosque had been reoccupied by insurgents and attacked it again.

Four of the insurgents appeared to have been shot again in Saturday’s fighting, and one of them appeared to be dead, according to the pool report. In the video, a Marine was seen noticing that one of the insurgents appeared to be breathing.

A Marine approached one of the men in the mosque saying, “He’s [expletive] faking he’s dead. He’s faking he’s [expletive] dead.”

The Marine raised his rifle and fired into the insurgents head, at which point a companion said, “Well, he’s dead now.”

The camera then shows two Americans pointing weapons at another Iraqi insurgent lying motionless. But one of the Marines step back as the insurgent stretches out his hand, motioning that he is alive. The other Marine stands his ground, but neither of them fires.

When told by the pool reporter that the men were among those wounded in Friday’s firefight, the Marine who fired the shot said, “I didn’t know, sir. I didn’t know.”

“You can hear the tension in those Marines’ voices. One is saying, ‘He’s faking it. He’s faking it,'” Heyman said. “In a combat infantry soldier’s training, he is always taught that his enemy is at his most dangerous when he is severely wounded.”

A Marine in the same unit had been killed just a day earlier when he tended to the booby-trapped dead body of an insurgent.

NBC reported that the Marine seen shooting the Iraqi insurgent had himself been shot in the face the day before, but quickly returned to duty.

About a block away, a Marine was killed and five others wounded by a booby-trapped body they found in a house after a shootout with insurgents.

Amnesty International has noted reports that insurgents have used mosques as fighting positions, and have used white flags to lure Marines into ambushes.

The Marine who shot the insurgent has been withdrawn from the battlefield pending the results of an investigation, the U.S. military said.

These terrorists do not follow the rules of war. These terrorists kill innocent women by disemboweling them, cut of the heads of innocent truck drivers, detonate car bombs in crowds full of innocent people, and fly planes into buildings filled with innocent Americans.

It is my opinion that NOTHING should happen to this American Marine. He should be returned to his unit or be given an honorable discharge. We don’t need our young men and women taking an extra second to decide if its right to shoot an enemy terrorist when that could mean that one of our soldiers could lose their life. The lives of our soldiers should be the single most important factor in this war against terrorism. The rights of terrorists can come second.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned

Sign the petition

78000 people had signed the petition when I posted this. At 1pm on November 20th, I was number 31595.

I found #86716 said to be very insightful:

written by: Rance R Stowell
I am a Vietnam veteran and was with the 101st Airborne Division. I was an infantry soldier and the first American I watched die was from a friendly young boy who put a bomb in a burn barrel that was on fire. It exploded and killed the soldier next to me.What givies anyone who is not in a combat situation the right to second guess the soldier who is making that decision so that he and his fellow solders will live another day. They are doing a job just as we do each day. Getting up and going to work.Let them do the job they are put there to do!! The solider should not be punished in any way, but honored for saving his fellow soliders Lets Unite and make this happen.

World’s largest digital photo

TNO has produced the largest digital panoramic photo in the world. So, what do we mean by large? After all, modern consumer cameras can easily take a picture with 5 million pixels. Well, we are talking about a photo of completely different dimensions. One with 2.5 billion pixels – that’s 500 times more pixels. If this photo were printed, it would measure 6.67 m by 2.67 m (300 dpi). The photograph shows Delft and its surroundings in the autumn of 2004. It was taken the top of the Electrical Engineering faculty of Delft University, at a height of about 100 m, by TNO.

Here’s the Slashdot link.

The coolest part is that they have the entire picture hooked up to a flash app. You can see the entire view and then specifically zoom to see something in the distance. I was even able to view the license plate and makes of some of the cars in the picture!